Demo District
District Hub
District Hub
Academic progress · 10-year facilities plan · survey integration · 2024–2025
Today
—
—
5,710
Assessment Records
36%
Avg Tier 1 Rate (EOY)
$118.9M
10-Year Facilities Budget
$65M+
Deferred Project Backlog
4
Demo Schools
2026
Peak Spend Year
Explore the Hub
Academic Progress
MTSS Tier 1/2/3 breakdowns, growth trends across BOY → MOY → EOY, and school-level comparisons using real iREADY and NWEA data from the 2024–2025 school year.
5,710
Records
4
Schools
2
Assessments
Student Explorer
Drill into individual student records — grouped by MTSS Tier with full detail on score, placement, growth, Lexile, teacher, class, and subgroup flags (ELL, SpEd, Econ. Disadvantaged).
800
Records
4
Schools
3
Tier Groups
10-Year Capital Plan
Central and East Campus infrastructure projects, funding source breakdown, annual spend projections, and the full deferred project backlog — 2026 through 2036.
$118.9M
Total Cost
50+
Projects
6
Funding Sources
Progress Markers
Shared vocabulary for tracking where each capital project sits in its construction and budgeting lifecycle — a framework for facilities, finance, and the board.
4
Build Stages
4
Budget Stages
AI Insights
Ask natural language questions about academic performance, facilities spending, tier breakdowns, and growth trends. Get instant data-driven answers from the dashboard.
Ask
Anything
Live
AI Answers
Academic Progress ✓ Real Data
iREADY & NWEA · MTSS tier analysis · growth trends · school comparisons · 2024–2025 AY
Tier Distribution
Selected school · current period
School Comparison — Tier Breakdown
All schools · current period
Growth Trend — BOY → MOY → EOY
Average score across diagnostic windows
Student Records (sample from uploaded files)
| Student ID | Gr. | School | Assessment | Subject | Period | Score | Placement | Tier | Gain |
|---|
10-Year Capital Plan Draft
Demo District · 2026–2036 · figures in 2026 dollars · actual costs will increase with inflation
Total Planned
—
Deferred Backlog
—
Funded / Identified
—
Peak Spend Year
—
Annual Capital Outlay
By calendar year · $ millions · amber bars = near-term peak (2026–2028)
Funding Mix
Total projected cost by funding source · QS: Pie/Donut chart
Project Line Items
| Campus | Project | Category | Funding | Cost | Timing |
|---|
Progress Markers Reference
Shared vocabulary for tracking project status across construction and budgeting lifecycles
⬡ Reference document only — This page is NOT part of the QuickSight build. It is a shared vocabulary guide for the facilities team, finance, and the board.
Construction Progress Markers
Stage 1
Design / Scope Lock
Architect engaged, scope defined, drawings nearing completion. Cost estimates tightened; ready for permit submission.
Stage 2
Permitting / Procurement
Permits filed; bid packages issued or contracts negotiated. Long-lead items being procured.
Stage 3
Active Construction
Crews on site, work in progress. Change orders managed; payment applications being processed.
Stage 4
Closeout / Turnover
Punch list complete, commissioning underway, occupancy permit in hand. Final payment and warranty handoff.
Budgeting Progress Markers
Stage 1
Funding Identified
A funding source has been named but dollars are not yet allocated. Estimates may shift.
Stage 2
Budget Approved
Board has approved the funding allocation. Project is in the active capital budget for its scheduled year(s).
Stage 3
Committed / Encumbered
Contracts signed, POs issued, dollars formally encumbered against the project line.
At Risk
Deferred / At Risk
No funding source identified, or scope/timing unresolved. Backlog items live here until a funding decision is made.
How the two tracks relate. The construction track and the budgeting track move independently. A project usually has to clear Budget Approved before leaving Design / Scope Lock — but a fully constructed project can still sit in Committed / Encumbered until final payment closes the encumbrance. Deferred / At Risk exists only on the budgeting track.
Student Explorer ✓ Real Data
iREADY Reading + NWEA MAP · 2024–2025 · Demo District · Sort by RIT, Percentile, Sub-Domain
⬡ QuickSight Preview: Tier Groups, All Students, and NWEA Detail tabs → QS dashboard sheets. | Intervention Builder → Web tool only — QS is read-only; group building, + Add, and CSV export stay in this companion app.
Survey Data Integration
Student, staff & community survey data — planned for next phase
Survey Integration — Coming Next Phase
Connect student, staff, and community survey results to the District Hub for a complete picture of school climate and continuous improvement.
Planned for Phase 2
Student Climate Surveys
Track engagement, belonging, and learning environment sentiment by school, grade, and subgroup over time.
Staff Feedback
Collect and analyze teacher and staff input on instructional support, professional development, and building conditions.
Community & Family
Integrate parent and community feedback on facilities, programs, and communications to inform district planning decisions.
✦
Ask a question about the District Hub
A preview of the Amazon QuickSight Topics experience · Academic progress · Facilities plan · MTSS tiers · Growth trends
⬡ This reflects the natural language query capability that will be connected to your live QuickSight dashboard and topics
Which school has the highest Tier 1 rate at EOY?
How much is deferred across the 10-year capital plan?
Show iREADY growth from BOY to EOY for all schools
What is the peak spend year and how much is planned?
Compare School 1 and School 4 Tier 3 rates
What are the biggest deferred facilities projects?
Which funding source covers the most East Campus projects?
How did Demo School 4 Tier 1 change from BOY to EOY?
What are the NWEA results for Demo 2 at EOY?
Which campus has more deferred projects, Central or East?
What is the total HLS Bond spend across both campuses?
Which school has the most Tier 3 students at BOY?
Student Profile
Full assessment history · Intervention tags · Grade journey
Assessment Score History
iREADY scale score across all diagnostic periods · QS: Line chart
Tier Journey
MTSS tier at each diagnostic window · QS: KPI + conditional table
Intervention & Group Tags
From iREADY Report Groups — reflects historical intervention placement
Full Diagnostic History
| Period | Grade | School | Tier | Score | Placement | Gain | % to Typical | Lexile | Class | Teacher | Group Tags |
|---|
⬡ QuickSight equivalent: This profile page maps to a QS drill-down sheet — student-level filtered view of assessment history table + score line chart. Tags come from the Report Group(s) field in iREADY export data.